Q: Dear John – How do religions develop?

A: In my opinion, many (most?) world religions seem to fit a similar formation pattern:

Cult Status: As the religion first forms, it belongs in the “cult” classification – not because it is necessarily evil, but because it is small and relies heavily on the charisma of its founder.  Over time, as the prophet inevitably becomes corrupted by power, and discovered to be a fraud by his own followers, he is usually prone to engage in unethical behavior such as financial/sexual impropriety and sometimes violence.  Internal (religious challengers) and external (law and surrounding society) challenges to the prophet’s authority emerge – and the prophet struggles to maintain power.  Most often the cult ends in some sort of scandal – be it sexual, financial, or violent – or a combination of all three.
Established Church: On very rare occasions, either the prophet is successful at organizing and maintaining control, or he is martyred in a way that inspires continued or increased devotion – and the cult outlives its charismatic leader and grows into a successful religion.
Cycle Repeats: Inevitably, most cults/churches/religions lose steam and die over time.  As they whither and die, adherents lose the sense of inspiration, meaning, community, identity, and fulfillment that the cult/church/religion provided.  In many instances, they fall into a state of sadness and vulnerability without a cult/church/religion.  This makes them vulnerable to new prophets, and new cults/churches – and the cycle repeats itself in the lives of individuals (e.g., Martin Harris with James Strang), and across generations.  Unless a viable replacement for churches/religions can be found.
This is my best, first attempt at describing how religions form.  What do you like?  What do you dislike?  Most importantly, what did I miss?
Please share in the comments below.  And thanks!

6 Responses

  1. There is a glaring omission here: “an observant, charismatic leader emerges (e.g., Moses, Mohammad, Joseph Smith)”
    Why have you not included Jesus Christ?

  2. Good work, John! I found this very helpful as an explanation.
    I think fear is a huge component– which you touched on in the uncertainty and vulnerability in the human condition you mentioned above.
    I also think that trying to make sense of God’s place/efficacy in the injustice and pain we experience daily or see in others’ experiences pushes one to find answers through a religious belief. And if a person believes in God, then they look for answers to who/what/how that God operates and why he doesn’t come through in dire circumstances. Religion steps into that gap and provides myths, stories, answers for those willing to believe.
    I think this outline is great because it shows so many aspects of religion. Identifying why religions come about beyond the the age-old lie of the truth, or the need for religion so life can be better, or people will have values in their lives.
    Going it alone, without religion to lean upon, or reconcile life’s problems, or provide easy answers is a lot harder than it may seem. But, I find i t ultimately more rewarding personally
    Thanks for laying out your thoughts. I am tempted to post it on my personal facebook page as an answer to why I have chosen to remove religion and religious practices from my life. As per usual, you have created an article without rancor or assault to those who may be firmly entrenched in their choice to participate in and support religion in their lives, many of whom are friends, relatives, or even my own children.

  3. Excellent work on these essays, John.

    With regard to rituals — the idea has occurred to me that rituals (religious and otherwise) at their best are living works of art that communities create together. For example, I have experienced both the Mormon temple ceremony and a Catholic Mass as a sacred thing of beauty, although I am also aware that rituals can become a very unhealthy source of oppression, disturbing symbols, and cognitive dissonance — for example, the sense of urgency that drives my beloved Mormon husband to spend huge amounts of time and energy on genealogical research because he believes that a very specific ritual is necessary to get his ancestors out of the “spirit prison.” But on the other hand, he enjoys it immensely and has learned some fascinating things about both his side of the family and mine, going all the way back to the middle ages and beyond.

    I have told “non believers” who have issues with Mormon temple work that if the Mormons are right, then it will make people better off in the eternities, and if they’re wrong, and it doesn’t really make any difference, then they enjoyed their lives and felt closer to their ancestors, had a beautiful experience doing it, and 1000 years from now, it won’t make any difference.

    So what do you think of my take on rituals? Perhaps another example of how religion can do great good while also doing great harm, all at the same time…

  4. Very good summation of how religion encourages people into its ranks. I have come to believe that we humans come from tribal beginnings. Have you watched documentaries about the primates? They always move in groups small and large much the way humans must have historically. Our human tribes have largely become extinct in our modern world and religious organizations have emerged as the next best thing to fill the need. Religious participation allows one to connect and find community and purpose with other humans and Mormonism seems to do it better than most.

  5. One thing I could never find an answer to as a member was the need for ordinances. Even as a bishop, I could never give a good explanation for why we needed to participate in them. I had a very strong leader tell me that the thing that really attracted him to the church was the ordinances and he had a strong testimony that they were essential for salvation. But I could never understand why. I thought Bednar would provide a good learned explanation a few years ago when he addressed that very topic in general conference. But… nope. Nothing about why they were necessary for salvation. Now, when I saw that Ritual was a factor here in how religions develop it really struck me that ordinances are pushed so heavily by the church because they instill in its followers a sense of deep and somber commitment and obligation. Once the person has participated in the ordinance, he or she has entered into a deep religious commitment, the breaking of which will result in extreme punishment/negative consequence, such that the participant is now afraid to go back on it. It becomes so ingrained that the person superstitiously fears eternal damnation or similar consequence should they “betray” the ordinance. This ritual/ordinance is essential for religions to develop because it binds the adherent to the religion more than mere belief in the teachings can ever do.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *