Polygamy & Abortion in Joseph Smith’s Nauvoo – John C. Bennett Pt 2 w/ LDS Discussions Ep. 50 | Ep. 1854


Download MP3

In this episode, we expose the layers of Bennett’s role in divulging Joseph’s polygamous secrets. From secret women’s organizations with captivating names like Cyprian Saints to the complex web of polygamous relationships, we journey through a fascinating exploration of historical allegations and denials. Brace yourself for a captivating ride through the world of John C. Bennett, where accusations, clandestine affairs, and the shadowy specter of abortionist connections add layers of complexity to this historical puzzle.


LDS Discussions is made possible by generous donors!
Help us continue to deliver quality content by becoming a donor today:

LDS Discussions Platforms:

Contact LDS Discussions:

Contact us:

MormonStories@gmail.com
PO Box 171085, Salt Lake City, UT 84117

Social Media:


Show Notes:

Mormon Stories Related:

A supporter is worth a thousand followers

Your generous donations ensure we can continue to provide support for those transitioning. Help us keep these essential discussions alive and accessible to all by making a donation today.

similar episodes

4 Responses

  1. Smith lying about his polygamy (and polyandry) and having others lie as well. Consider this legal notion “falsus in uno falsus in omnibus. Latin for false in one thing false in everything. This is a court instruction often given jurors to help them decide the credibility of a material witness.

  2. Near the end of the conversation, the team talks about the word “issue” used by William Law and there is a lack of understanding of what “issue” means with possible interpretations of it meaning “problems” or some kind of recourse. But I’m positive it means “children” or “desendents” in the legal sense (a bit antiquated but consistent with a historic legal meaning of talking about a person’s issue (meaning a persons offspring or descendants)). I think this gives great meaning to William’s statement and how Joesph S surprisingly had no “issue” from his plural marriages and sexual relationships.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *