Today we’re going through various apologetics and theories around the Book of Abraham to reconcile it being considered scripture along with what we know the literal interpretation of these things to be. What problems do these apologetics create in other areas for believers? Do these theories hold water without a strong bias to believe in spite of all evidence? Do some apologists even admit it?
LDS Discussion Essay on Book of Abraham
LDS Discussions is made possible by generous donors!
Help us continue to deliver quality content by becoming a donor today:
- One-time or recurring donation through Donorbox
- Support us on Patreon
- Pick “Mormon Stories” as your charity on Amazon Smile or through the Amazon App
LDS Discussions Platforms:
- LDS Discussions Website
- LDS Discussions on Anchor
- LDS Discussions on Spotify
- LDS Discussions Playlist on YouTube
Contact LDS Discussions:
- Twitter: @ldsdicussions
- Facebook: @ldsdiscussion
- Insta: @ldsdiscussions
- Email: ldsdiscussions@gmail.com
Contact us:
MormonStories@gmail.com
Mormon Stories Podcast
PO Box 171085
Salt Lake City, UT 84117
Social Media:
Show Notes:
Related Content:
- 1701: Book of Abraham Pt. 1, Joseph Smith’s Translation w/ LDS Discussions – 30
- 1339-1341: Dr. Robert Ritner – An Expert Egyptologist Translates the Book of Abraham
- 1519: Joseph Smith’s Egyptian Grammar and Alphabet – Dan Vogel
- 1397: Civil War – John Gee vs. the Joseph Smith Papers Project
Other Reviews
One Response
If anyone seems to think that the hosts have been a bit hard on Hugh Nibley, take John Larsen’s advice and go straight to the source documents – in this case, lectures. Whatever opinion of Nibley you hold, see how you feel after ten minutes of listening to any of these.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ehBxXyk-Ots&list=PLOrN0FV73AsIeKPG48pi390UWWdOVyIgi