Join us for an eye-opening discussion with renowned scholars Sandra Tanner and Dan Vogel as we analyze a compelling video featuring BYU professor and prominent Mormon historian Steven C. Harper. In this thought-provoking conversation, we explore key challenges surrounding the First Vision narrative and Harper’s response to concerns raised by the CES Letter.
We delve into historical inconsistencies, including the evolving accounts of Joseph Smith’s vision, the role of revival movements in the 1820s, and the significant differences between the 1832 and 1838 accounts. Our discussion examines the impact of other Mormon historians such as Fawn Brodie and Richard Bushman, highlighting how their research has shaped the understanding of Mormon history.
Throughout the video, we address pressing questions: Why did the church keep certain documents hidden for decades? How have Mormon historians like Harper attempted to reconcile discrepancies in Joseph Smith’s accounts? What role does faith play in historical interpretation, and at what point do shifting narratives become problematic?
From exploring the influence of memory studies on apologetics to discussing the credibility of Mormonism’s foundational events, this discussion critically examines the evidence with an honest and scholarly approach. Whether you’re new to the topic or well-versed in Mormon history, this episode offers valuable insights into the ongoing debate surrounding the First Vision and the broader implications for those questioning their faith.
Don’t miss this deep dive into one of the most pivotal topics in Mormon history—watch now and join the conversation!
The original interview can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXHntOmMJRg&t=26s
One Response
It is literally called “the first vision” y’all.
Also, what’s wrong with trying to harmonize the multiple versions into a single telling? If it’s harmonious, I don’t see the problem.