Just found out from T&S that the trailer is now out for the PBS / Frontline / American Experience Documentary “The Mormons.”

It does look very interesting. Check it out.

Set to air April 30th and May 1st, 2007

17 Comments

  1. Paula April 15, 2007 at 11:23 pm

    I hear that the LDS public affairs people here in SoCal have instructed ward leaders that this should not be mentioned in bulletins or announced over the pulpit.

  2. From Utah April 16, 2007 at 9:34 am

    …Not true about LDS stance.

    The docuementary was done with the involvment and cooperation of the LDS church. A letter has been released from the First Presidency encouraging members to watch and answer non-members questions, if any arise.

    This is supposed to be a wonderul film work. We’ll be watching at our house!

  3. Aaron April 29, 2007 at 3:15 pm

    Yeah, Helen Whitney, who did this documentary, did a really fair documentary on the Catholics (I think she is agnostic, be sure to check me on this one) that convinced the LDS leaders to be interviewed. She even had the oppurtunity to interview LDS President, Gordon B. Hinkley. Here is an excert of he view of the Mormons she interviewed:

    The big surprise for her, Whitney said at the press tour, is “the emphasis on, and the expression of, certainty in the faith” that she found in so many Mormons. “The word ‘I know’ is used a great deal, and that’s striking to me because I think of faith as sort of this candle flickering in the dark.”

    From her interviews, it sounds like she left this project with very good feelings of the Latter-day Saints and I can’t wait to watch it myself.

  4. Aaron April 29, 2007 at 3:15 pm

    Yeah, Helen Whitney, who did this documentary, did a really fair documentary on the Catholics (I think she is agnostic, be sure to check me on this one) that convinced the LDS leaders to be interviewed. She even had the oppurtunity to interview LDS President, Gordon B. Hinkley. Here is an excert of he view of the Mormons she interviewed:

    The big surprise for her, Whitney said at the press tour, is “the emphasis on, and the expression of, certainty in the faith” that she found in so many Mormons. “The word ‘I know’ is used a great deal, and that’s striking to me because I think of faith as sort of this candle flickering in the dark.”

    From her interviews, it sounds like she left this project with very good feelings of the Latter-day Saints and I can’t wait to watch it myself.

  5. Paula April 29, 2007 at 4:10 pm

    From Utah, not sure if your comment was directed at mine or not, but I got the letter myself. It said that the documentary should not be mentioned in bulletins or over the pulpit, because whoever initiated the letter was concerned about the content.

  6. Garden Grove Ca April 30, 2007 at 3:31 pm

    Here in Garden Grove we heard the same as Utah did and it was published in our bullitan

  7. John Dehlin April 30, 2007 at 4:03 pm

    Can someone please send me a copy, or the text, of these warnings/bulletins?

    mormonstories@gmail.com

    Thanks!!

  8. Ricercar April 30, 2007 at 4:19 pm

    I first heard about this production through the pre-packaged “Church News of the World” program that was broadcast along with General Conference. I remember because I wondered if Helen Whitney of the documentary is related to the great Mormon proto-feminist / Joseph Smith wife Helen Mar Whitney.

    There haven’t been any announcements up here along the New York / Ontario boarder that I have heard about.

  9. Paula April 30, 2007 at 6:30 pm

    I received this longer email, which I’ve pasted below, but removed all names from. Also, there was a shorter one, to the effect that we should tell local leaders not to put this in the bulletins, but right now I can’t find the copy of it. I received the longer one much more recently, but I think that the short one was probably based on this long one. Where I have removed names, I’ve added text in caps. (I left in Will Bagley’s name, figuring that he wouldn’t care, and that it will be obvious after the documentary airs.)

    “The following is from GENERAL AUTHORITY’s brother…

    Dear Stake Presidents and Public Affairs Directors,

    I just found out recently about the upcoming PBS show on
    “Mormons” on April 30th and May 1st. I had forwarded a
    “trailer” of the show to the DPAs, as I felt I should share what little
    I knew with you. Elder XXXXXX and XXXXXXX, XXXXX Area
    Director of Public Affairs, had contacted me a week ago concerning the
    fact that they had heard there were stakes considering taking out ads
    to promote the show. That was the first I’d even heard about it, but
    it was evident that the Church was not behind promoting the show,
    apparently for good reason.

    Bishop XXXXXXXX from El Dorado Stake just copied me on an email
    with comments by some members in Southern California that had been
    interviewed as part of the show and had been given a preview of it.
    Apparently the first segment is totally negative about polygamy and The
    Mountain Meadows Massacre. Will Bagley, a Salt Lake City author, is
    apparently the “historical advisor” for this project and Will is
    certainly not particularly friendly to the Church and especially not to
    Brigham Young. The comment from the members after watching the first
    segment was that…

    “a less than firmly grounded Mormon seeing the first two
    hours of “The Mormons” might well feel ashamed to be a Mormon, and
    non-Mormons would carry away a strong distaste for Mormons. There is
    little in the segment being shown on the 30th that gives a positive
    Latter-day Saint viewpoint.”

    “While I had hopes that the program would be a fair-minded treatment of
    the Mormons, I learn instead that it is an ‘expose’ of the ‘wrongs’ in
    Mormon history. It is a smooth but bigoted and
    unprincipled assault on the Church.”

    They said after seeing parts of
    the second two-hour segment that at least an LDS viewpoint was allowed
    side-by-side criticism of the Church
    (e.g., on the issue of ). They also thought that most
    people would be so turned off by the first two-hour segment that they
    wouldn’t want to see the second part.

    I really know very little about this, but I just wanted to give
    you a “heads-up” so you can be prepared to respond to any negative
    reactions triggered by this show.

    XXXXXXX (GENERAL AUTHORITY’s brother)
    XXXXXXX Multi-stake DPA”

    I’m not a public affairs person for the church, but got stuck on the ward leaders email list awhile back, and still get the emails.

  10. Paula April 30, 2007 at 6:33 pm

    I received this longer email, which I’ve pasted below, but removed all names from. Also, there was a shorter one, to the effect that we should tell local leaders not to put this in the bulletins, but right now I can’t find the copy of it. I received the longer one much more recently, but I think that the short one was probably based on this long one. Where I have removed names, I’ve added text in caps. (I left in Will Bagley’s name, figuring that he wouldn’t care, and that it will be obvious after the documentary airs.)

    “The following is from GENERAL AUTHORITY’s brother…

    Dear Stake Presidents and Public Affairs Directors,

    I just found out recently about the upcoming PBS show on
    “Mormons” on April 30th and May 1st. I had forwarded a
    “trailer” of the show to the DPAs, as I felt I should share what little
    I knew with you. Elder ZZZZZ and YYYYY, WWWWW Area
    Director of Public Affairs, had contacted me a week ago concerning the
    fact that they had heard there were stakes considering taking out ads
    to promote the show. That was the first I’d even heard about it, but
    it was evident that the Church was not behind promoting the show,
    apparently for good reason.

    Bishop QQQQQQQ from El Dorado Stake just copied me on an email
    with comments by some members in Southern California that had been
    interviewed as part of the show and had been given a preview of it.
    Apparently the first segment is totally negative about polygamy and The
    Mountain Meadows Massacre. Will Bagley, a Salt Lake City author, is
    apparently the “historical advisor” for this project and Will is
    certainly not particularly friendly to the Church and especially not to
    Brigham Young. The comment from the members after watching the first
    segment was that…

    “a less than firmly grounded Mormon seeing the first two
    hours of “The Mormons” might well feel ashamed to be a Mormon, and
    non-Mormons would carry away a strong distaste for Mormons. There is
    little in the segment being shown on the 30th that gives a positive
    Latter-day Saint viewpoint.”

    “While I had hopes that the program would be a fair-minded treatment of
    the Mormons, I learn instead that it is an ‘expose’ of the ‘wrongs’ in
    Mormon history. It is a smooth but bigoted and
    unprincipled assault on the Church.”

    They said after seeing parts of
    the second two-hour segment that at least an LDS viewpoint was allowed
    side-by-side criticism of the Church
    (e.g., on the issue of ). They also thought that most
    people would be so turned off by the first two-hour segment that they
    wouldn’t want to see the second part.

    I really know very little about this, but I just wanted to give
    you a “heads-up” so you can be prepared to respond to any negative
    reactions triggered by this show.

    GENERAL AUTHORITY’s BROTHER
    BBBBBBBB Multi-stake DPA”

    I’m not a public affairs person for the church, but got stuck on the ward leaders email list awhile back, and still get the emails.

  11. Joyce Champion April 30, 2007 at 9:22 pm

    We were told about the documentary at our Ward in Utah. It was presented as something that would be interesting and that would prompt a lot of people to ask us questions, to which we should answer with honesty.

  12. Main Street Plaza May 1, 2007 at 10:04 am

    […] the truth. The hysterical response of some believers to The Mormons and the apparent emergence of urban legends show that the correlated approach has become a self-fulfilling prophecy. As was inevitable, new […]

  13. Washington May 1, 2007 at 3:08 pm

    I think that is someone wants to hear about Mormons, they should ask someone who IS Mormon! The truth isn’t EVER going to be seen on the televsion, unless it’s on the BYU Channel. People believe what they see on T.V. and it’s a bad reputation for us Mormons.

  14. Hueffenhardt May 1, 2007 at 3:38 pm

    I think if someone wants to hear about Mormons, they should ask a Mormon…and an ex-Mormon, and several historians who have studied Mormonism, and read as many original sources of info that they can both pro and con.

    Understandably, if you ask a Mormon about Mormonism, you will get a biased answer. They may not tell you about things they don’t think you can handle (i.e., men can become gods, or what goes on in the temple, etc) and they will not tell you what they don’t know, for example, most Mormons don’t know Joseph got married to his own teenage foster daughters.

    Now, ex-Mormons will have a bias as well, so if you want a more complete picture, you need to speak to many people with different perspectives about Mormonism and then investigate it for your self both from Church approved sources and sources that the church does not control.

  15. Jordan May 1, 2007 at 4:55 pm

    We were told about this documentary in church weeks in advance, and encouraged to watch it.

  16. Lyn May 1, 2007 at 5:59 pm

    I’m a recent convert, and I may be one of the few who’s willing to tell the beautiful and the ugly that I’ve encountered in my short time as a Latter-day Saint. During my spiritual journey, I read books purchased at you know which place and Borders/Barnes & Noble/etc. I spoke with my parents and with various religious leaders. I also went by what I felt. I am open to telling people about my spiritual journey, where it led me and that their journeys may lead them to a similar destination or elsewhere. I will not drag a horse to water. When the horse is ready, it will drink. The only thing that I do ask for, and am sometimes not afforded, is respect for my decision.

  17. Michelle May 4, 2007 at 5:16 pm

    I find it amazing that Joseph Smith could have an “affair” with a nineteen year old who lived in his home…and then “marry” her under the guise of a divine revelation. Adultery…under no uncertain terms. Yet…the gay man in the program made it clear he was excommunicated for adultery.

Comments are closed.